Member stories

Accounts from study groups who have worked with Corefieldhub — including the parts that did not go perfectly the first time.

Our Tuesday evening calls used to drift for forty minutes before anyone agreed on a timeframe. After four Weekly Screen Review sessions, we open on the daily chart, mark invalidation within five minutes, and usually finish on time. The template felt rigid at first — two members nearly quit — but it gave us something to argue against rather than arguing from habit.
Helen M.Bath equities group, six members, 2025 cohort
Tom ran our Annotation Clinic after we'd been meeting independently for a year. He spotted that three of us were drawing support lines from wick lows while the others used bodies. Embarrassing, but fixable. The written feedback was more useful than the call itself.
Priya S.Online FX circle, Bristol-based members
We booked the Kickstart because a new member kept dominating airtime. Eleanor assigned a timekeeper role and it actually worked — though honestly we still overrun when someone brings a crypto chart. At least now we notice when it's happening.
Mark D.Frome commodities group, four members
I joined my partner's existing group mid-way through a term. The colour key helped me catch up, but I wish we'd had a dedicated onboarding slot. Eleanor offered a thirty-minute catch-up which helped. Not flawless, but thoughtful.
Rachel W.Taunton indices study pair (expanded to five)

Extended case: the Mendip Chart Circle

Small group meeting with charts projected on a wall

The Mendip Chart Circle formed in early 2024 when five acquaintances from a Wells gardening club discovered a shared interest in commodity charts. They met monthly at each other's homes, but sessions lacked structure — charts appeared on phones, discussion jumped between cocoa and copper without resolution, and nobody kept notes.

They booked a Study Group Kickstart in March 2024, then enrolled in Weekly Screen Review for a twelve-week term. Eleanor helped them agree on a single charting package for shared screens (two members still use their preferred tools for personal work), established a presenter rotation, and introduced the fifteen-minute opening sequence.

By week eight, the group was producing session summaries that all five could follow. They paused weekly facilitation in June but return quarterly for Annotation Clinics. Member David L. notes: "We still disagree plenty. The difference is we disagree about the same lines on the same chart, and we write down why."

Share your group's story after working with us